- Romford Wasps U16 2 vs Cambridge Grizzlies U16 · Dec 20, 2025137 days overdue — contact Cambridge Grizzlies U16 manager
Cambridge Grizzlies and MK Storm played out a goalless draw home in a cagey affair where neither side could find the breakthrough.
A disciplined defensive display kept the team in the game, with both goalkeepers rising to the occasion.
A solid point earned that keeps their campaign on track.
| Player | GP | G | A | P | P/GP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oliver Long#62UP · U14 SOUTH 2 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 1.50 |
| Liam Morse#41 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.55 |
| Gabriel Parry#5DIV · U16 SOUTH 1 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.56 |
| Cornelius Henson#10 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.29 |
| Elijah Tischner#98 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.31 |
| Chaoyi Jiang#8 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.21 |
| Lyla Adams#54 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.25 |
| Alexander Phillips#66 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.25 |
| Adam Rybalchenko#92UP · U14 SOUTH 2 |
Cambridge Grizzlies are struggling for form, managing just 1 points from their last 6 games (6% of available points). Their 0-1-5 (W-D-L) record shows difficulties picking up results, with 5 defeats outweighing the 0 wins.
Results are trending upward, with more points coming in recent games compared to earlier in this period. This improving trajectory is an encouraging sign.
Goalscoring has been a challenge, netting just 6 times at 1.0 per game. Finding ways to be more clinical in front of goal would significantly boost results. Worryingly, goals have dried up in recent fixtures compared to earlier in this run.
The defense has leaked 33 goals at an alarming 5.5 per game. This vulnerability is putting enormous pressure on the attack to outscore opponents, which isn't sustainable long-term. Positively, fewer goals have been conceded recently, indicating improved defensive organization. The concerning -27 goal difference underlines the need for improvement at both ends.
Performance has been fairly consistent regardless of venue - 0 wins from 3 at home and 0 from 3 on the road.
Guiseppe Depaolo has been solid in goal with a 87.0% save percentage and 4.26 GAA across 8 games. While there's room for improvement, the goaltending has been respectable.
Most recently, a 0-0 draw with MK Storm saw points shared. However, 4 heavy defeats by 3+ goals are concerning and suggest the team can struggle when things go wrong.
Cambridge Grizzlies currently sit in 8th place with 7 points from 14 games played. They are projected to maintain their current position through the remaining 2 games, finishing with approximately 8 points.
The concerning form rating of 7/100 reflects difficult recent results. Contributing factors are limited goalscoring (1.2 goals/game) and defensive vulnerabilities (5.6 conceded/game).
Home advantage has been significant, with a 2-5-1 record at home compared to 0-5-1 on the road. This 25% home win rate versus 0% away suggests the remaining home fixtures will be crucial. The remaining schedule looks favourable, with opponents averaging below the league mean. Only 0% of remaining games are at home, making the run-in tougher.
The projected finish range of 7th to 9th reflects the uncertainty in any prediction. This narrow range suggests a relatively predictable finish, though close competition means every point will matter.
The outlook requires attention. Issues such as poor current form and defensive struggles need to be addressed for results to improve.
| Metric | This Season | Last Season | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Position | 8 | — | — |
| Points | 7 | — | — |
| Wins | 2 | — | — |
| GF | 22 | — | — |
| GD | -49 | — | — |
Bristol and Cambridge are separated by just 1 place in the table, making this a genuine six-pointer for both teams.
Bristol boast the stronger attack this season, averaging 2.1 goals per game compared to Cambridge's 1.6. That firepower could prove decisive if they find their rhythm early.
Defensively, Bristol have been more solid, conceding 4.5 goals per game. Cambridge will need to tighten up at the back, having let in 5.1 on average.
Form-wise, both teams have been fairly evenly matched with similar win rates this season.
Bristol's goal difference of -34 highlights their overall dominance this season.
With little separating these sides across the key metrics, this one looks set to be decided by fine margins. A share of the points wouldn't surprise anyone.
| 10 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 0.10 |
| Beau Harwood#42 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.08 |
| Dylan Falosk#29UP · U14 SOUTH 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.10 |
| Guiseppe Depaolo#2 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.08 |
| Reuben Nancekievill#17 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.07 |
| A FlackettDIV · U16 SOUTH 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| A ChoyDIV · U16 SOUTH 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Andrew Tsepkalo#53UP · U14 SOUTH 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Andrey Volkov#7UP · U14 SOUTH 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Charlie Myers#88UP · U14 SOUTH 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Dexter Moore#13 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Jamie Li#39UP · U14 SOUTH 2DIV · U16 SOUTH 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Loz O'Connor#28 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Peter Tsepkalo#32UP · U14 SOUTH 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Teddy Williams#93 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Torren Linton#73UP · U14 SOUTH 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |